antitruststartupsreal estate

Antitrust Audit for Real Estate Startups: Practical Steps to Avoid Litigation

UUnknown

2026-02-14

10 min read

Practical antitrust audit checklist for proptech startups and brokerages—address pricing, steering, MLS data use, and disclaimers to reduce litigation risk in 2026.

Stop Waiting — Start This Antitrust Audit Now: A practical playbook for proptech startups and brokerages

If you’re building a proptech product or running a forward-leaning brokerage, every product change, data feed, and pricing policy can create antitrust exposure. The recent wave of litigation around MLS rules and agent steering — and high‑dollar data‑misuse verdicts in adjacent tech sectors in early 2026 — means regulators and plaintiffs’ lawyers are watching platforms that touch listing data and commission incentives. This checklist helps you act fast to reduce the risk of expensive litigation.

Why now (short): the 2025–2026 shift that matters

NAR and steering litigation trend. Multiple lawsuits have focused on alleged coordinated rules and agent steering away from lower‑commission listings. In one recent complaint, a plaintiff alleged MLS and local association rules discouraged exposure of listings with reduced buyer commissions; a magistrate judge in early 2026 recommended denying a preliminary injunction in that individual case but the litigation trend continues.
Data‑misuse liability is rising. A January 2026 jury verdict in an adtech/data case awarded significant damages for contract and data misuse — a cautionary bell for proptechs that rely on licensed MLS or third‑party data.
Enforcement focus has broadened to platforms and algorithms. Regulators and plaintiffs increasingly treat product design, search ranking, and automated recommendations as potential conduits for anti‑competitive conduct.

Audit overview: what this antitrust audit achieves

This audit identifies and documents real antitrust risk areas for real estate platforms and brokerages, produces remedial actions you can implement within 30–90 days, and creates an evidence trail that reduces exposure if litigation arrives.

Deliverables:

Risk map for pricing, commission display, and steering.
MLS and data‑license compliance review.
Algorithmic/UX steering assessment.
Remediation checklist and policy templates.
Retention and audit log plan for defensible documentation.

How to run the audit (timeline & team)

Run a focused audit in 4 phases over 30–90 days, coordinated by a compliance lead and outside antitrust counsel.

Phase 1 — Intake & risk triage (Day 1–7): Assemble product, legal, data, and brokerage ops leads. Map systems that touch MLS data, commissions, buyer leads, and search ranking.
Phase 2 — Document collection & interviews (Day 7–21): Pull contracts, MLS license agreements, API agreements, marketing language, TOS, and data‑flow diagrams. Interview product and listing‑ops teams about defaults and workflows. See our practical tips for collecting evidence in the data migration and preservation playbook for ideas on controlled exports.
Phase 3 — Technical & legal analysis (Day 21–45): Analyze algorithms, logs, and display logic for ranking or filtering effects. Legal team assesses contracts, disclaimers, and pricing policies against antitrust standards.
Phase 4 — Remediation & governance (Day 45–90): Implement high‑priority fixes (UI changes, disclosures, retention), train staff, and set monitoring cadence. Consider independent third‑party reviews and whistleblower-friendly processes for internal escalation.

Antitrust audit checklist for proptech startups and brokerages

Below is a practical, itemized checklist. For each line, collect the listed evidence and note the recommended remedial action.

1. Pricing policies & fee structures

Checklist: Document all seller and buyer fee schedules, promotional offers, and any guidance given to agents about recommending listings.
Evidence to collect: Pricing pages, fee schedules (historical), internal communications about commission negotiation, scripts or templates used by agents.
Red flags: Policies that penalize or exclude listings with lower or no buyer commissions; agreements or communications that suggest a collective pricing approach with competitors.
Remediation: Ensure fees are set unilaterally and defensibly; avoid any discussion or coordination with competitors about pricing; adopt clear internal policy forbidding price coordination.

2. Steering rules & agent behavior

Checklist: Review agent scripts, lead‑handling rules, referral flows, and policies that influence agents’ property recommendations.
Evidence to collect: Call scripts, CRM lead assignment rules, automated lead routing logic, training materials, and consumer complaints.
Red flags: Incentives for agents to avoid showing certain listings or to steer buyers to higher‑commission properties; automated rules that suppress or deprioritize lower‑commission listings.
Remediation: Update scripts and routing to forward buyer leads neutrally; require disclosure of referral relationships; document nondiscrimination rules for lead distribution and implement monitoring. Consider how AI summarization and agent-assist tools affect scripts and oversight.

3. MLS data use, licensing & access

Checklist: Compile all MLS agreements (IDX, VOW, data feed licenses), API terms, and any scraping or third‑party data source contracts.
Evidence to collect: Signed contracts, usage logs, data ingestion schedules, and engineering documentation on how MLS fields are parsed and displayed.
Red flags: Using MLS data outside permitted use cases, re‑licensing MLS data to competitors, scraping without permission, or failing to comply with IDX display rules.
Remediation: Implement strict contractual review processes; keep an access inventory; obtain explicit licenses for any new use cases; preserve original MLS attribution and contact display rules; disable any scraping workflows immediately until reviewed. Use secure change controls and consider automated checks from your platform or third‑party vendors to tag permitted uses.

4. Search, ranking & recommendation algorithms

Checklist: Map algorithmic inputs and defaults that affect listing visibility — price, commission, sponsored placement, and personalized recommendations.
Evidence to collect: Code comments, parameter files, A/B test logs, feature flags, and training data for ML models.
Red flags: Weighting schemes that systematically penalize listings with lower buyer commissions; undisclosed paid placement arrangements tied to compensation; default settings that produce predictable anti‑competitive outcomes.
Remediation: Create a documented justification for ranking signals unrelated to competitor suppression; add neutralization experiments; maintain an audit trail of model changes and A/B test results (store logs in a secure evidence regime such as a dedicated evidence capture system).

5. Disclaimers, consumer disclosures & TOS

Checklist: Review public website language, email templates, buyer‑agent disclosures, and consumer‑facing legal notices for clarity about commissions and lead flows.
Evidence to collect: Current and historical copy of TOS, privacy policy, FAQ language, and IDX display used on consumer pages.
Red flags: Hidden or misleading language about commissions; statements that referral or lead handling is controlled by a third party when it is not; failure to disclose paid placements.
Remediation: Use clear disclosures that explain how leads are handled and whether sponsor relationships exist. Where appropriate, include plain‑language statements such as:

Sample disclosure (adapt for your facts): “Our platform displays listings from multiple sources. We may receive leads on behalf of sellers or buyer brokers. You can view the agent contact listed on each property, and we do not block or hide listings based on buyer agent compensation.”

6. Contracts, partner agreements & competitor interactions

Checklist: Review supplier contracts, MLS partnership agreements, and any discussions or meetings with local associations or competing brokerages.
Evidence to collect: Meeting minutes, emails, price or policy proposals exchanged with competitors, and non‑disclosure agreements.
Red flags: Communications implying price or market‑sharing agreements, coordinated policies across competitors, or joint policies that limit consumer choice.
Remediation: Train executives and business development on antitrust safe‑harbors; log any cross‑company communications and run rapid legal review of collaborative proposals. Consider internal channels and protections like whistleblower programs to surface risky proposals safely.

7. Recordkeeping, logs & incident response

Checklist: Ensure retention policies capture key product changes, pricing histories, lead routing logs, and decision memos; secure immutable logs for 2–7 years depending on risk.
Evidence to collect: Version control history, release notes, timestamped logs showing ranking parameter changes, and archived marketing collateral.
Red flags: Short retention windows, overwritten logs, or poor documentation of decision rationales.
Remediation: Implement a retention schedule consistent with legal counsel recommendations; adopt WORM storage or secure backups for high‑risk artifacts and integrate with your evidence capture processes.

8. Training, culture & escalation paths

Checklist: Antitrust training for product, sales, and partnerships teams; clear escalation to legal for any coordination with competitors or association rule questions.
Evidence to collect: Training rosters, slide decks, acknowledgment receipts, and escalation logs.
Remediation: Quarterly training and a one‑page quick guide for business teams explaining what to avoid and how to escalate. Include guidance on how new AI tools may change workflows — see notes on AI summarization for agent teams.

Practical remediation playbook (first 30 days)

Publish a temporary disclosure on listing pages that explains lead routing and commission display policies.
Disable any automated rules that filter listings based on buyer commission until legal sign‑off.
Freeze changes to algorithms that affect listing visibility and log a code freeze with reason.
Collect and secure all MLS license agreements and tag permitted use cases in a single contract register.
Assign a compliance owner and schedule weekly triage meetings with antitrust counsel. Consider automated checks and vendor integrations to monitor license scope.

Advanced strategies and future‑proofing (2026 and beyond)

Regulators and plaintiffs in 2026 view platforms as both potential victims and vectors of antitrust harm. Take these advanced steps to reduce long‑term exposure and make your company resilient.

Algorithmic transparency: Maintain explainable model documentation and a changelog that describes business rationale for ranking signals. This is increasingly expected in litigation and regulatory inquiries; consider pairing documentation with independent checks or vendor reviews.
Third‑party compliance audits: Periodic independent audits of MLS data use and nondiscrimination by a neutral auditor reduce risk and create credible defenses.
Insurance & indemnities: Review D&O and tech E&O policies to ensure antitrust and data‑misuse exposures are considered; align contractual indemnities with partners and data providers.
Data provenance and contracts: Create a data lineage map and require express license terms for downstream uses; keep a compliance log of license scope for each dataset.
Engage with trade groups cautiously: If you participate in MLS or association working groups, document your positions and avoid discussions that could be viewed as price or market allocation coordination.

Case studies and real‑world lessons

Two recent public developments illustrate how antitrust and data‑misuse risk can materialize:

MLS/steering litigation (2025–2026): New complaints have asserted that association rules and MLS practices discouraged exposure of listings with nonstandard buyer compensation. Even where courts may deny injunctive relief on narrow procedural grounds, the litigation mobilizes discovery that can be costly and reputationally damaging.
Data‑use trial verdict (January 2026): A jury awarded tens of millions of dollars in a contract/data misuse dispute in the adtech sector. The verdict underscores how quickly claims related to unauthorized data use or scraping can escalate, and it signals plaintiff interest in high‑value damages theories. Preserve your logs and consult evidence‑preservation playbooks to avoid spoliation issues.

Red flags checklist: immediate stop and escalate

New product change that hides seller or buyer agent contact details.
Automated routing that deprioritizes listings with lower buyer commissions.
Scraping or storing MLS fields not permitted in the signed license.
Communications with competitors that discuss pricing, market shares, or coordinated product policies.
Deletion of logs or lack of retention for ranking parameter changes.

Evidence preservation checklist for legal holds

If you suspect a claim may arise, issue a legal hold and preserve:

All versions of pricing and fee pages.
Source code and model snapshots for recommendation engines.
API logs showing MLS field usage and access timestamps.
Internal communications discussing steering, commissions, or MLS policy enforcement.

What judges and juries care about in 2026

Evidence of intent remains powerful, but courts increasingly accept technical evidence showing anticompetitive effects even without explicit conspiracies. That means defensible product design, documented business rationales, and clear consumer disclosures matter more than ever.

Quick resources & policy templates (actionable now)

One‑page antitrust quick guide for business teams (create and distribute company‑wide).
Neutral lead‑routing policy template: default is to forward buyer leads to seller‑designated contacts and document exceptions.
Standard MLS license register template: capture permitted uses and renewal dates.
Model change log template for ranking or recommendation systems.

Final takeaways — what to do this week

Run the Red flag checklist and freeze any product changes that touch commission display or lead routing.
Collect and centralize MLS/data licenses and tag permitted use cases.
Publish a plain‑language disclosure on listing pages explaining lead handling and compensation visibility.
Schedule an antitrust counsel review of your pricing and partnership practices.

Call to action

If you want a pragmatic, documented antitrust audit tailored to your product and local MLS rules, we can help coordinate an accelerated 30‑ to 90‑day program: contract review, algorithmic assessment, remediation roadmap, and training. Protect your startup or brokerage before discovery and plaintiffs’ lawyers force the timeline.

Contact our antitrust audit team today to schedule a scoping call and get the checklist in editable format. Early action is the most cost‑effective defense.

Unknown

Contributor

Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.